Philip Henderson
About Author
June 8, 2021
News / Press Releases

Football Index - Judgment

Re BetIndex Limited [2021] EWHC 1542 (Ch)

Judgment has today been handed down in the above matter by Deputy Judge Robin Vos sitting as a Judge of the Chancery Division.  The judge has determined that the entitlements of customers are fixed by reference to their “Customer Funds” as at 26 March 2021 and that the trust funds should be distributed as soon as possible.  

The Court held that trust monies should be used first to pay each customer’s entitlement to “Customer Funds” as at 26 March 2021.  This includes dividends which had accrued up to that date (even if they have not been credited to the customer’s account by 26 March 2021).  The Court further held that any surplus should be paid to BetIndex and that customers with claims in respect of winnings accruing after 26 March 2021 will have a claim as unsecured creditors of the Company. 

In reaching his decision, Deputy Judge Vos noted: “The purpose of the trust is to safeguard funds which were owed to customers at the date of insolvency and not any funds which may become due after that date. 

This is in my view consistent with paragraph 11.3 of BetIndex’s terms of use which states that “once you have purchased Shares, the applicable value of your Shares have been “wagered” and are not stored in any account or otherwise protected as they are sums at risk.”.  In a similar way, possible winnings in respect of those shares which have not arisen at the time of the Insolvency Event are also at risk in that they have not yet become due and so are not covered by the protections conferred by the trust arrangements.

H&J had argued that the whole of the trust monies should be distributed to customers and that monies should not be paid to the Company in circumstances where further dividends have already accrued so that there is now no surplus but, in fact, a deficit between the amounts owed to customers and the amounts held in the trust.  Deputy Judge Vos expressed his sympathy for this position but found it is inconsistent with what he found to be the correct interpretation of the trust deed.  

While the judgment means that customers with dividends accruing after 26 March 2021 will not have recourse to the trust funds, we note the Judge’s observation that: “the overwhelming majority of creditors (both in number and in terms of the overall amount owed to creditors) are in fact the customers”. This means that customer claims should not be significantly diluted by the claims of other categories of creditors.

A copy of the full judgment is available at the link below.

More Posts

You Might Also Like

Read More
News / Press Releases

John Doyle Construction v Erith Contractors

The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in John Doyle Construction v Erith Contractors regarding the enforcement of adjudication decisions by insolvent companies.  The Court of Appeal seems to disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in Bresco v Lonsdale and its decision will create significant uncertainty for insolvent claimants in the construction industry. Please see below some of our thoughts on the judgment.
Oct 7, 2021
Philip Henderson
Read More

What to do when trusts are untrustworthy

Henderson & Jones has recently used an innovative assignment model to take control of a number of significant property assets for the benefit of bankruptcy estates. The property interests have now been secured and hundreds of thousands of pounds are due to be returned to the bankruptcy estates. See below for a brief explanation of how this was acheived.
Jul 8, 2021
Gwilym Jones
Read More
News / Press Releases

Statement re PIP victims' victory in Paris Court of Appeal

Today's decision from the Paris Court of Appeal is a significant breakthrough for thousands of women who have suffered as a result of the PIP implants scandal, who have been fighting for justice for over a decade. This ruling against TUV Rheinland - the company which certified these defective implants - is an important step, but there is much more work to be done. In the UK alone, it is estimated that close to 50,000 women have suffered as a result of PIP implants. In the UK, Henderson & Jones is continuing to fight for compensation for the patients of Hospital Medical Group through High Court proceedings against the former directors of Hospital Medical Group, the Wilkes Partnership LLP and Barclays Bank, to recover monies that were deliberately put beyond the reach of thousands of PIP victims."
May 20, 2021
Gwilym Jones