Philip Henderson
About Author
October 7, 2021
 in 
News / Press Releases

John Doyle Construction v Erith Contractors

In Bresco Electrical Services Ltd v Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Ltd [2019] ECWA Civ 27, the Court of Appeal (with the leading judgment given by Coulson LJ) concluded that there was a “fundamental incompatibility between the adjudication regime and the insolvency set-off regime" (paragraph 42).

The Court of Appeal’s judgment was overturned by the Supreme Court in Bresco Electrical Services Ltd v Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Ltd [2020] UKSC 25 with Lord Briggs noting: “I do not regard construction adjudication as in any way incompatible with the operation of the insolvency code in general, or with insolvency set-off in particular.” (paragraph 42)

For many, it is therefore surprising that, despite Lord Briggs’s findings in Bresco, the Court of Appeal (with the leading judgment again given by Coulson LJ) has today concluded in John Doyle Construction v Erith Contractors [2021] EWCA Civ 1542 that there remains a “fundamental incompatibility between the adjudication regime and the insolvency set-off regime” (paragraph 93).

This judgment creates significant uncertainty for insolvent claimants in the construction industry, which is especially unhelpful in the post-pandemic era. This decision may unfortunately encourage non-payment of amounts due to insolvent companies and could embolden contractors to refuse to pay insolvent entities.

John Doyle will now pursue its claim through the Courts. The adjudication decision in its favour may not be directly enforceable but, as noted by Coulson LJ, “the fact that the adjudicator has apparently considered the claims and found in the claimant’s favour will put the defendant on the back foot throughout” the ensuing litigation.

More Posts

You Might Also Like

Read More
Articles

What to do when trusts are untrustworthy

Henderson & Jones has recently used an innovative assignment model to take control of a number of significant property assets for the benefit of bankruptcy estates. The property interests have now been secured and hundreds of thousands of pounds are due to be returned to the bankruptcy estates. See below for a brief explanation of how this was acheived.
Jul 8, 2021
Gwilym Jones
Read More
News / Press Releases

Football Index - Judgment

Judgment has today been handed down in Re BetIndex Limited regarding the distribution to customers of funds held in a trust by BetIndex Limited t/a Football Index. Please see our summary of the key findings and a link to the full judgment.
Jun 8, 2021
Philip Henderson
Read More
News / Press Releases

Statement re PIP victims' victory in Paris Court of Appeal

Today's decision from the Paris Court of Appeal is a significant breakthrough for thousands of women who have suffered as a result of the PIP implants scandal, who have been fighting for justice for over a decade. This ruling against TUV Rheinland - the company which certified these defective implants - is an important step, but there is much more work to be done. In the UK alone, it is estimated that close to 50,000 women have suffered as a result of PIP implants. In the UK, Henderson & Jones is continuing to fight for compensation for the patients of Hospital Medical Group through High Court proceedings against the former directors of Hospital Medical Group, the Wilkes Partnership LLP and Barclays Bank, to recover monies that were deliberately put beyond the reach of thousands of PIP victims."
May 20, 2021
Gwilym Jones